Thursday, June 2, 2016

A Practical Use for sUAS in the Real Estate Sales Services


              Selling a home is no easy task and the real estate agents that find new and creative ways to market a home tend to be the most successful.  Those successful real estate agents will tell you that one of the most important aspects of selling a home is investing in the project through efficient marketing.  Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) offer an opportunity for real estate agents to present unique photos and videos of the home they are representing to potential buyers.  Some agents claim that “drones” are the most important new technology to enter real estate marketing since the internet (Nixon, 2016).  The sUAS offers never before seen clarity in both pictures and video that give a potential buyer a better view of the home while searching over the internet.  The real estate agent who offers these live video and aerial photography options to a home seller will be sure to sell homes quicker and at a higher asking price than those who don’t. 

              There are currently three very capable platforms that can do a professional job of real estate aerial services.  The DJI Inspire, Phantom 4, and the 3DR Iris are all reasonably priced entry level commercial off the shelf (COTS) solutions to real estate photography. 

The DJI Inspire 1 V2.0 is a revolutionary HD camera drone that makes it easy for 1- or 2-person teams to produce extremely high quality 4K HD and Micro Four-Thirds video from up to 2 km away (Nixon, 2016).  DJI has packed a ton of new technology into the Inspire 1 to improve reliability, safety and video quality (Nixon, 2016).  With an entry level price below $3,000 and an intuitive Professional DJI Flight Control System, this is a smart choice for someone who wants to purchase a vehicle, remove it from the box, and begin working.  The DJI is capable of flying indoors without GPS which is a necessity while filming large scale luxury homes.  Most users will experience approximately 18-20 minutes of flight in stable low wind conditions.   If you’re looking for a ready-to-fly camera drone for professional-quality film making, surveillance, inspection, law enforcement or event coverage, the Inspire 1 is tough to beat at this price (Nixon, 2016). 

The DJI Phantom 4 is slightly cheaper and a highly suitable platform for UAS aerial photography.  Designed for high-quality aerial photography and cinematography, the DJI Phantom 4 is the most intelligent, easy-to-operate flying camera drone available for less than $2,000 (Nixon, 2016).  The Phantom 4 has demonstrated up to 24 minutes of flight and is capable of flight as far as 1.2 miles.  One might think it would be difficult to maintain FAA mandated line of sight as far as 1.2 miles, and they would be correct.  The biggest breakthrough for the Phantom 4 is its inclusion of a new Optical Sensor unit and real-time 3D vision system that makes it capable of automatically detecting and avoiding obstacles while in flight (Smith, 2016).  Sense and avoid is a tremendous selling point as part of the real estate aerial services safety mitigation plan. 

3DR has built a vehicle known as the IRIS that can be fitted with a moveable gimbal and GoPro camera making it a viable performer in this class of sUAS.  Max flight time is listed as 22 minutes.  The Iris uses a standard controller but has other options for control that are less than reliable.  Capability is not as advanced as the other options but for an entry price just under $1,000, the 3DR is a nice entry platform for the beginner UAS aerial photographer.  

              While using a sUAS might seem like an extremely lucrative business idea to some, there are numerous issues surrounding the business application of aerial vehicles.  First and foremost, operations aren’t currently legal without navigating the incredibly cumbersome FAA process of obtaining a Certificate of Authorization and Type 333 exemption.  While many are operating despite those qualifications, the FAA has been quick to fine many operators.  The list below also outlines some limitations in the capabilities of a sUAS. 

There are still certain kinds of photos and videos that a flying camera is not well suited for, including:
Carefully-focused, fixed position photography. For example, shots designed to avoid an unpleasant feature or to help a room or yard appear larger.
The interiors of smaller spaces, such as condos or apartments
Homes shrouded by trees or other buildings.
Standard street-level shots that all buyers have come to expect in a listing.              (Nixon, 2016)

Other users have found sUAS as a hype or fad that doesn’t really offer any unique capability.  This is a tool of macro proportions only (Smith, 2014). That means that it’s only really useful for wide shots, like aerial views from 100 to 200 feet (or higher) (Smith, 2014).  Every breeze from a passing car or the AC unit is going to push it away or pull it down (Smith, 2014).  This particular writer doesn’t share which vehicle they used in their assessment, but it’s easy to surmise that they either used one of lesser capability or did not know how to operate their vehicle to optimize its features. 

               Privacy is a tremendous concern when operating a sUAS in an area where other homes or individuals may be filmed or photographed.  Special care must be taken by the operator to canvas the neighborhood and inform others about the nature of the operations prior to initiating flight.  Privacy rights regarding public photography and video is a grey area, especially in the technologically advanced world of cell phone cameras and videos that currently proliferate the public. 

              Risk Mitigation needs to be a consideration when operating sUAS in real estate photography.  A wise operator will have dedicated areas for launch and recovery that are sectioned off from the general public.  Clear signage and explanations of the operations will also alleviate public concerns regarding safety and privacy.  Insurance and liability should be a prime concern for the operator as well.  There are plenty of forces beyond your control that can bring your drone down and put your business on hold – or worse, damage a person or property (Amato, 2015). Getting hull and liability insurance for your drone often costs about as much as a second drone so it may be worth getting some coverage if you are going to aggressively pursue new opportunities (Amato, 2015). 

              Once the FAA approves a clear set of rules, regulations, and policies the real estate photography business will be a lucrative venture for UAS operators.  The three drones listed are initial COTS vehicles that have proven their capability.  These initial pioneers pave the way for future designs that will be sure to add additional capability while adding safety measures to protect the public from harm. 

REFERENCES
Amato, A. (2015, May).  7 Pieces of Advice to Consider When Starting an Aerial Photography Company; Dronelife.com.  Retrieved from http://dronelife.com/2015/05/12/7-advice-aerial-photography-company/
Smith, C. (2014, August).  8 Reasons Why Not to Buy a Drone for Real Estate Videos; Tampa Bay Area Wholesale Real Estate & Investment Properties.  Retrieved from http://btgh.com/why-not-to-buy-a-drone-for-real-estate-videos/

Nixon, A. (2016, April).  Fly It, or Buy It? The Complete Guide To Using Camera Drones for Real Estate Marketing; Best Drone for the Job.  Retrieved from http://bestdroneforthejob.com/drone-buying-guides/fly-it-or-buy-it-the-complete-guide-to-using-camera-drones-for-real-estate-marketing/

1 comment: